Your Thesis > Your Portfolio

GM, Welcome Back to The KillChain

My inbox is busier than a mosquito at a nudist colony. Dozens of you writing in with the same question in different words: "Should I sell?" "Is it over?" "What do I do?"

So this week, we're hitting pause on the usual fraud roundup. No Lazarus Group heists. No pig butchering schemes. No exit scams. Those will be waiting for us next edition because criminals don't take market correction breaks.

Instead, we're going back to basics. Why you bought Bitcoin in the first place. Why the thesis and the price aren't the same thing. And why institutions using ETF mechanics to shake out overleveraged retail while accumulating cheaper is exactly the playbook we've documented before.

If you're scared, read this. If you're not scared, read it anyway. Then decide what you're building: conviction, discipline, or an expensive education in how wealth transfers from the impatient to the patient.

Let's talk about why the number on your screen doesn't change what Bitcoin actually is.

Bitcoin touched $64,000 Thursday before recovering to $70,266. Ethereum tested $1,800. Solana broke through $100 and hit $70. The entire crypto market has shed over $800 billion in four months. ETFs hemorrhaged $6.18 billion since November. Liquidations hit $775 million in a single day. Over 165,000 traders wiped out.

If you're reading this, you either held through the carnage or you're trying to figure out if you should have. Your portfolio is bleeding. Your group chats have gone quiet. Every price alert feels like another gut punch.

This is what capitulation looks like. The question is whether you're participating in it.

I haven't sold anything. Not because I enjoy watching numbers go red. Because the fundamentals that made me buy Bitcoin haven't changed. What changed is how Bitcoin gets bought and sold in public markets. ETFs now control over $113 billion in Bitcoin. When institutions redeem ETF shares, fund sponsors must sell Bitcoin to pay them back. That selling has nothing to do with Bitcoin's value and everything to do with portfolio managers rotating money around. While this mechanical selling pushes prices down, the same institutions often buy back cheaper through new ETF purchases later. You're watching wealth transfer, not value destruction.

The thesis and the price are not the same thing. One is why you bought. The other is what institutions use to extract money from people who confused conviction with gambling.

Most of you didn't buy Bitcoin because you thought it would hit $126,000. You bought it because:

The fiat system is mathematically broken. U.S. national debt: $38.43 trillion as of January 7, 2026. Up $2.25 trillion in one year. Growing at $8.03 billion per day. Interest payments hit $981 billion in fiscal 2025, crossing $1 trillion in 2026. Second-largest federal expense after Social Security, bigger than Medicare and defense combined. The government pays $82 billion per month just to service existing debt. Interest costs tripled in five years, from $345 billion in 2020.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects interest will consume 14.52% of all federal outlays by FY 2028. That's not a budget line item. That's a structural trap. The system cannot delever without crisis. It cannot stop expanding without collapse.

Bitcoin represents opt-out infrastructure. Self-sovereign. Permission-less. No treasury secretary. No regime change risk. Operates outside the system that just told you it won't save you. Scott Bessent confirmed to Congress: Treasury has no authority to stabilize crypto markets. That's the feature you signed up for.

Decentralization and scarcity are binary. Either the 21 million cap holds or it doesn't. Either the network stays decentralized or it doesn't. Either you control your keys or you don't. Price dropped 44% from October peak to the $70,266 we're at now. The protocol didn't move.

Network processes blocks every 10 minutes, exactly as designed. Hash rate near all-time highs despite price pressure. Over 2,300 validator nodes securing the network. Settlement works identically at $126,000 and $70,266.

Nothing about Bitcoin's value proposition changed because Warsh got nominated or BlackRock had outflows. The monetary policy you were hedging against got more hawkish. The two-front war intensified exactly as predicted.

Your thesis didn't break. The test got harder.

Measuring Bitcoin success in the currency Bitcoin was designed to replace is like measuring gold value in Weimar marks during 1923. Technically possible. Fundamentally meaningless.

U.S. debt-to-GDP: 121%. Higher than the World War II peak of 106%. Every major central bank trapped between inflation and recession, choosing debasement. The system requires perpetual monetary expansion to function.

The BTC/USD pair isn't pure price discovery. It's a battlefield where institutions use ETF mechanics to control buying and selling pressure regardless of what Bitcoin is actually worth.

ETF holders average cost basis: $87,830. Current price: $70,266. Institutions down 20% in three months. But Galaxy's Alex Thorn noted cumulative ETF inflows dropped only 12% while Bitcoin fell 38% from peak.

Bitcoin down 44% from peak. Institutional capital redemptions down 12%. They're holding massive paper losses rather than capitulating. Their thesis isn't "number go up in dollars." Their thesis is "reserve asset as fiat system proves unsustainable."

Glassnode data shows small holders (under 10 BTC) persistently selling for over a month. But small holders don't move markets. They don't have the capital. Mega-whales (1,000+ BTC) quietly accumulating during the blood.

Same pattern. Every cycle. Large capital plays conviction. Small capital plays sentiment and vibes.

The primary selling pressure is institutional, not retail.

November 2025 through January 2026: $6.18 billion in ETF outflows. That's institutional capital allocators, pension funds, family offices redeeming ETF shares.

When BlackRock's IBIT sees $373 million in single-day outflows, that's institutional portfolio rebalancing, risk-off rotation, tactical profit-taking.

The ETF redemption process is mechanical: large financial institutions return shares to the fund sponsor, who must sell Bitcoin to pay them back. Zero regard for Bitcoin fundamentals. Just mechanics creating forced selling.

The feedback loop:

They create the dips. They buy the blood. They profit from retail panic in between.

January 29: $818 million ETF outflows pushed Bitcoin to $81,200. While Fidelity, Grayscale, Ark, and Bitwise posted massive outflows, only BlackRock's IBIT posted inflows: $60.03 million. While everyone else was redeeming, BlackRock was accumulating.

This week's crash wasn't fundamental reassessment. Warsh spooked macro traders. Institutional ETF redemptions created mechanical selling. Overleveraged retail got margin called. Small holders panic-sold into institutional buy orders.

On January 30, President Trump nominated Kevin Warsh to be the next Federal Reserve Chair, replacing Jerome Powell when his term expires in May 2026.

Within 72 hours: Bitcoin crashed 17%. Gold plunged 20%. Silver crashed 40%. $250 billion evaporated from crypto markets.

Why markets panicked:

Kevin Warsh is a monetary policy hawk. Former Fed Governor 2006-2011, youngest in Fed history at 35. During the 2008 financial crisis, he was the most vocal opponent of QE2. He publicly warned that large-scale asset purchases and zero-interest policies were distorting markets, creating moral hazard, undermining long-term stability.

His track record is clear: favor monetary discipline, higher real interest rates, smaller Fed balance sheet, rules-based policy to prevent bubbles. Where Jerome Powell gave markets "whatever it takes," Warsh promises "whatever discipline requires."

Markets understand this means tightening: less liquidity, higher borrowing costs, potential balance sheet reduction. Crypto historically thrives in easy-money environments. Traders front-ran the expected policy shift by dumping risk assets.

Warsh's monetary discipline is exactly why Bitcoin should matter more, not less.

If Warsh becomes Fed Chair and tries to tighten policy, one of two things happens:

Scenario 1: The economy breaks. Credit markets seize. Overleveraged institutions need bailouts. Markets crash. And the Fed reverses course, expands the balance sheet again, cuts rates again, does QE again. Because that's what always happens when they try to normalize. The system proves it cannot function without perpetual monetary expansion. Bitcoin's core thesis validated in real-time.

Scenario 2: Warsh successfully tightens, the economy handles it, and we get actual monetary discipline. Interest rates stay higher, money supply growth slows, inflation stabilizes. But that means the system needed Bitcoin's "policeman" function (Warsh's own words) to force discipline. The threat of capital flight to hard assets like Bitcoin is what enabled the discipline. Bitcoin's value as alternative monetary system validated.

Either way, Bitcoin wins the argument.

And Warsh knows this. In 2015, he told billionaire hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller: "It could provide market discipline, it could tell the world that things need to be fixed. I think of bitcoin as a lot of things, but certainly with every passing day it's getting new life as an alternative currency." In 2021, when Bitcoin traded around $30,000, he said: "If you're under 40, Bitcoin is your new gold."

Warsh isn't hostile to Bitcoin conceptually. He's hostile to the macro conditions that create speculative excess. But those conditions exist because the fiat system is trapped. Bitcoin isn't the problem Warsh identifies. Bitcoin is the market signal that the problem exists.

The market is treating Warsh's Fed Chair nomination as bearish for Bitcoin. The actual implication: he's bearish for the system Bitcoin was designed to replace. Those are not the same thing.

Short-term pain is real if you're overleveraged. But if you hold Bitcoin because you believe the fiat system is fundamentally unsustainable, Warsh potentially accelerates the timeline for proving you right.

Fiat debasement inevitable: Debt-to-GDP 121%. Interest $82 billion monthly. System requires perpetual expansion.

Fixed supply superior: 21 million cap unchanged. Network security at all-time highs.

Institutional adoption accelerating: MicroStrategy hasn't sold. Tesla holding. El Salvador accumulating. New ETF products launched despite crash.

Two-front war: Treasury confirms no bailouts. Liquidation cascades prove predatory infrastructure works as designed.

Nothing fundamental broke. Price dropped because institutions used ETF mechanics to create selling pressure, overleveraged positions got liquidated, macro fears spooked allocators. Market structure warfare, not Bitcoin failure.

Look, some of you bought Bitcoin to make money. Not because you care about decentralization. Not because you read whitepapers. You saw it going up and wanted in. Maybe you bought at $100,000. Maybe $110,000. Maybe $120,000.

That's completely legitimate. There's nothing wrong with wanting to make money. But right now you're down 30-40% and trying to figure out what to do.

Here's what you need to understand: this has happened before. Multiple times. And every single person who panic-sold during previous crashes regretted it.

The pattern is consistent:

2021-2022: Bitcoin hit $69,000, crashed to $15,000. That's 78%. Everyone declared it dead. Then it ran to $126,000. Anyone who bought at $15,000 made 8.4x. Anyone who sold at $15,000 watched it happen without them.

2017-2018: Bitcoin peaked at $19,800, crashed to $3,200. That's 84%. Endless obituaries. Then 2021 happened. Bitcoin hit $69,000. Anyone who bought at $3,200 made 21.5x.

2013-2015: Bitcoin hit $1,100, crashed to $200. That's 82%. Mt. Gox collapsed. Space was "over." Then 2017 happened. Bitcoin hit $19,800. Anyone who bought at $200 made 99x.

Current drawdown: 44% from $126,000 to $70,266. You're not even at "crypto winter" levels yet.

"But this time is different!" Every crash feels different. The story changes. The result stays the same: overleveraged people get liquidated, institutions accumulate cheaper, patient holders capture the recovery.

Do you have an exit price written down? Not "when it feels bad." Actual number. If yes, and we hit it, you execute. That's discipline.

Or are you hoping it goes back to $126,000 so you can "break even and get out"? That's not a plan. That's cope. And institutions are counting on you to think exactly that while they accumulate at $70,266, wait for the next run to $150,000+, and sell into your FOMO when you finally feel safe again.

Or did you realize you never had any plan beyond "crypto goes up"? Maybe this week is teaching you that hope isn't a strategy.

Why you might have bought (be honest with yourself):

"Everyone was talking about it" → You followed hype. Hype always ends. The market just taught you that popularity doesn't equal value; this ain’t high school anymore babe. Expensive lesson, but cheaper than the next one.

"Price was going up" → Momentum trading works. But only if you have stop-losses and profit targets. Without those, you're not trading. You're just getting moved around by other people's decisions.

"ETFs meant it would keep going up" → ETFs gave institutions tools to control price through mechanical buying and selling. You bought the story. They used the mechanics.

"Someone said $200,000 by end of year" → Price predictions are marketing. They drive clicks and sell newsletters. The market doesn't care what someone promised you on X.

"I think Bitcoin has long-term value but I'm stressed watching it drop" → Then you actually have a thesis. Price dropping doesn't change whether decentralized money matters. It just tests whether you believed what you thought you believed. This is the uncomfortable part where conviction gets tested.

What actually makes Bitcoin go up over time:

None of those reversed this week. What reversed was sentiment and leverage. Sentiment is noise. Leverage is self-inflicted risk.

The historical pattern: Every previous Bitcoin cycle, anyone who bought at ANY price during a major drawdown and held 18+ months made money. Every time. 100% success rate across four complete cycles.

Not a guarantee. But not a coincidence. The fundamentals driving long-term appreciation operate on longer timeframes than the market mechanics driving short-term volatility.

If someone described Bitcoin to you today from scratch (decentralized, fixed supply of 21 million, secured by massive computing network, operates 24/7 globally, no government can inflate supply or censor transactions) and asked if you think that's valuable in a world where:

Would you say that's more or less valuable than four months ago?

More valuable. The tighter they squeeze monetary policy, the clearer it becomes the fiat system needs perpetual expansion. Bitcoin is an exit.

For people who bought believing in the technology: You didn't sell because your thesis is intact. Price dropped 44%. Conviction didn't.

For people who bought to make money: Every person who panic-sold previous crashes regretted it. People who sold at $3,200 watched it hit $69,000. People who sold at $15,000 watched it hit $126,000. Betting against recovery has been wrong for 15 years straight.

Option 1: Exit. Sell now. Take the loss. Get out. Completely legitimate if you can't handle volatility or realized this isn't your game. But be honest with yourself: you're selling because you're scared, not because Bitcoin broke. Own that. Learn from it.

Option 2: Hold and hope. Keep your position hoping for recovery but with no clear understanding of why it would recover beyond "it did before." This is the worst option. You'll be miserable the whole way. You'll eventually panic sell at the actual bottom when you can't take it anymore. Then watch it recover without you. Don't do this.

Option 3: Develop conviction. Use this crash to figure out what you actually believe about Bitcoin. Not what influencers told you. What YOU think. If you conclude it has no real value, see Option 1. If you conclude it does, you just became a conviction holder and price swings get easier.

Option 4: Develop discipline. Accept you're trading, not investing. Set actual price targets. Use stop-losses. Take profits at predetermined levels. Manage position size. Treat it like a business. If you can't do this with discipline, you're just gambling.

Institutions are underwater at $87,830 average cost basis. You're buying at $70,266. That's a 20% discount to where institutions entered. Who has the edge?

You're uncomfortable because you're watching the market figure out what Bitcoin is worth with institutional selling mechanics, Fed policy uncertainty, and liquidations. That process is violent. If it were easy, everyone would be rich.

The people who make money in crypto aren't the ones who never see drawdowns. They're the ones who don't panic-sell into them. Either because they have conviction about what they're holding, or because they have discipline about how they trade.

Which one are you building?

Hoping it goes back up so you can break even isn't conviction or discipline. It's wishful thinking. You've found a genie lamp offering three wishes and you're using all of them to beg for your $110,000 entry price back while BlackRock is over there wishing for your Bitcoin at $70,266.

Your move.

Why does business news feel like it’s written for people who already get it?

Morning Brew changes that.

It’s a free newsletter that breaks down what’s going on in business, finance, and tech — clearly, quickly, and with enough personality to keep things interesting. The result? You don’t just skim headlines. You actually understand what’s going on.

Try it yourself and join over 4 million professionals reading daily.

Check it out

The KillChain Disclaimer

Not Financial Advice. The KillChain provides market intelligence for educational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice. References to "accumulation zones," "buy levels," or trading language describe analytical frameworks, not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any asset.

You're In Command. You alone are responsible for your investment decisions. Consult a registered investment adviser or qualified professional regarding your individual circumstances. Do your own research. Verify everything. Trust no one, including us.

Crypto Is Volatile and Risky. Digital assets are highly speculative. You can lose some or all of your investment. Past performance doesn't predict future results. Markets can go to zero. Regulatory landscapes shift. Exchanges fail. Wallets get hacked. If you can't afford to lose it, don't invest it.

We May Hold Positions. The FraudFather and KillChain contributors may hold positions in assets discussed. We're sharing analysis as market participants, not acting as your fiduciary, broker, or adviser. Our interests may not align with yours.

Stay Sharp. Stay Solvent. This newsletter is for sophisticated readers who understand risk management and personal responsibility. We provide intelligence. You make decisions.